Morris v. Redmond(INMATE3)

Plaintiff: George Hoey Morris
Defendant: Susan R. Redmond
Case Number: 2:2011cv00002
Filed: January 3, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 27, 2012 48 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: 1. Plaintiff's 47 Objections are OVERRULED; 2. The 45 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. An appropriate judgment will follow. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/27/2012. (dmn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris v. Redmond(INMATE3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Hoey Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan R. Redmond
Represented By: Robert Randolph Neeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?