Weatherly v. Montgomery City Commission et al (INMATE 2)
||Ronald Vatedro Weatherly
||Montgomery City Commission, Montgomery City Police Dept and J. L. Williams
||February 4, 2011
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Charles S. Coody
||Truman M. Hobbs
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 13, 2011
ORDER that 1. The plaintiff's objections 10 to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on March 18, 2011 are overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 9 filed on March 11, 2011 is adopted; 3. Plaintiff's complain t against the Montgomery City Police Department and the Montgomery City Commission is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 4. Defendants Montgomery City Police De partment and the Montgomery City Commission are DISMISSED as parties to the complaint. 5. This case with respect to the remaining defendant is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 6/13/2011. (jg, )
|February 17, 2011
ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $1.66 be paid on or before March 10, 2011; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at the Childersburg Community Work Release. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 2/17/2011. (jg, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?