King v. U.S. Attorney et al (INMATE3)

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Middle District King v. U.S. Attorney et al (INMATE3)

King v. U.S. Attorney et al (INMATE3)

Plaintiff:	Benny Ray King
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2011cv00186
Filed:	March 15, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	Calhoun
Presiding Judge:	Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge:	Ira De Ment
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 2, 2013	Filing 34 ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (2) the 28 USC 2255 motion filed by King is DENIED, as it was filed after expiration of the one-year-limitation period in 28 USC 2255(f) and the claims therein entitle him to no relief. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/2/13. (djy, )
March 17, 2011	Filing 2 ORDER that the court advises King of its intention to recharacterize his pleading as a motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 USC 2255, as further set out; directing that on or before 4/15/2011, King shall advise the court whe ther he seeks to do one of the following: 1. Proceed before this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on those claims presented in his motion 1 ; 2. Amend his motion to assert any additional claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on which he wishes to challenge the conviction and sentence imposed upon him by this court; or 3. Withdraw his motion, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 3/17/11. (djy, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 2, 2013

Filing 34 ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (2) the 28 USC 2255 motion filed by King is DENIED, as it was filed after expiration of the one-year-limitation period in 28 USC 2255(f) and the claims therein entitle him to no relief. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/2/13. (djy, )

March 17, 2011

Filing 2 ORDER that the court advises King of its intention to recharacterize his pleading as a motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 USC 2255, as further set out; directing that on or before 4/15/2011, King shall advise the court whe ther he seeks to do one of the following: 1. Proceed before this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on those claims presented in his motion 1 ; 2. Amend his motion to assert any additional claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on which he wishes to challenge the conviction and sentence imposed upon him by this court; or 3. Withdraw his motion, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 3/17/11. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. U.S. Attorney et al (INMATE3)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benny Ray King
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By:	Kent B. Brunson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?