Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Snider et al
| Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company |
| Howard Snider, Pam Snider, Jeff Beale Homes and Jeff Beale |
| Jeff Beale Homes and Jeff Beale |
| Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, Howard Snider and Pam Snider |
| 2:2011cv00215 |
| March 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company's 85 Motion forSummary Judgment is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART; The motion is DENIED as MOOT to the extent it seeks summa ry judgment on the duty to defend counterclaims made by the Beale Defendants, and GRANTED in all other respects; (2) Pam and Howard Sniders' 86 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; (3) the trial currently set March 10, 2014 is CANCELLED, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/11/14. Furnished to calendar group & WR.(djy, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER GRANTING 44 MOTION to Amend Scheduling Order, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/9/12. (djy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
