Snowden v. Hetzel et al (INMATE2)
| Jeff Alexander Snowden |
| Luther Strange and Gary Hetzel |
| 2:2011cv00379 |
| May 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Jefferson |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Wallace Capel |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER directing that, after a review of the 31 Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Jeff Alexander Snowden is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/30/14. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER that the instant habeas petition be held in ABEYANCE pending completion of Petitioner's pending Rule 32 proceedings. Respondents shall file notice with the court upon completion of said proceedings, and in no event, not more than ten (10) days after Petitioner's post-conviction proceedings become final in accordance with the state's procedural rules. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 7/5/2011. (br, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ON MOTION granting 12 MOTION to Amend; answers to the amended petition due 7/12/2011. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 6/21/2011. (br, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
