Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Tomberlin, Young & Folmar Insurance Co. et al

Plaintiff: Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant: Tomberlin, Young & Folmar Insurance Co., John S. Tomberlin and Harold W. Young
Case Number: 2:2011cv00468
Filed: June 15, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 25, 2012 163 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 161 MOTION for Extension of Deadlines for Completion of Settlement and all deadlines are extended for thirty days. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/25/2012. (furn: Calendar, eb)(PTC for 11/28/2012 @ 10am extended to 12/28/2012 @ 10am; Jury Selection for 01/07/2013 extended to 2/6/2012; Jury Trial for 01/14/2013 extended to 2/13/2013)(wcl, )
June 14, 2012 148 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that (1.) The 112 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to the voluntary payment rule and statute of limitations grounds asserted in the Motion; (2.) The Plaintiff is given until June 29, 2012 to file a sho rt supplemental brief addressing Auto-Owners' contentions that John Tomberlin's representations/suppressions regarding the letter of credit issued to Smith in 2006 has not been alleged as a separate claim in the Amended Complaint, and the c ontention that the claims in Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint are limited to claims based on Michael Smith's failing to obtain bonding on subcontracts, and not any other financial issues of Michael Smith and his company which existed before the bond was issued by Auto-Owners, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/14/12. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Tomberlin, Young & Folmar Insurance Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Represented By: Roger Stephen Morrow
Represented By: Wendell L Jones
Represented By: Thomas E Crafton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tomberlin, Young & Folmar Insurance Co.
Represented By: Audra Michelle Bryant
Represented By: Richard Burton Bush
Represented By: Edward Martin Weed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John S. Tomberlin
Represented By: Audra Michelle Bryant
Represented By: Richard Burton Bush
Represented By: Edward Martin Weed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harold W. Young
Represented By: Audra Michelle Bryant
Represented By: Richard Burton Bush
Represented By: Edward Martin Weed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?