Couch v. Marshall et al(MAG+)
||Kimberly Monique Couch
||D. T. Marshall and Dante' Johnson
||November 4, 2011
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Charles S. Coody
||Myron H. Thompson
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 14, 2012
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE and ORDER directing that Couch's 32 motion to amend be and is hereby DENIED; further, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (a) that the motions to dismiss (Docs. 27 and 35 ) filed by Marsha ll be GRANTED; (b) that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 29 ) filed by Johnson be GRANTED; (c) that Couch's § 1983 and § 14141 claims against Marshall and Johnson be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief c an be granted; (d) that Couch's state law claims against Marshall and Johnson be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); and (e) there being no other pending claims in this action, that this case be DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/14/12. (scn, )
|March 6, 2012
ORDER directing that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's 26 recommendation, to which no objection has been filed, is adopted; (2) The 8 motion to dismiss and alternative motion for more definite statement are denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/6/12. (scn, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?