Ragan v. Sebelius et al
| Mary Katherine Ragan |
| Kathleen Sebelius, Center for Medicare Services, Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractor and Maximus Federal Services |
| 2:2011cv01019 |
| December 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER directing that plaintiff Mary Katherine Raga''s 5 motion for order to release funds is granted to the extent that the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama is authorized to release to plaintiff Ragan or her attorney the interpled funds in this case, which was removed from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County to this federal court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/5/12. (Furnished to Cashier/Finance) (scn, )
|
|
Filing
11
JUDGMENT directing that it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the 10 motion to dismiss is granted and that this cause is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; further ORDERED that the 8 motion for other relief is denied as moot; further ORDERED that no costs are taxed; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/16/12. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
