McGuire v. City of Montgomery, et al
| Michael A. McGuire |
| Kevin J. Murphy, D. T. Marshall, Hugh B. McCall, Luther Strange, City of Montgomery, Alabama Department of Public Safety and Todd Strange |
| 2:2011cv01027 |
| December 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Charles S. Coody |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
365
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 361 motion for reconsideration is GRANTED; 2) Plf's 361 motion for an interim award of costs and attorney's fees is GRANTED IN PART to the extent provided in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. In all other respects, Plf's 361 motion for an interim award of costs and attorney's fees is DENIED; 3) Dft Stephen T. Marshall's 363 motion to summarily deny Plf's 361 motion for reconsideratio n is DENIED; 4) On or before 2/1/2017, the State Official Dfts (Dfts Charles Ward, Stephen T. Marshall, D. T. Marshall, in their official capacities) shall deliver to Attorney McGuire $82,417.00, representing a reasonable interim attorney's fee for Mr. McGuire's work in obtaining the relief afforded by the 284 Judgment. This figure does not reflect fees on appeal; 5) Plf may file a motion for costs and additional attorney's fees, including the EJUL attorneys' fees, att orneys' fees reasonably incurred with respect claims on which Plf may prevail on appeal, fees and costs incurred after entry of the judgment, and any other appropriate attorneys' fees and costs, no later than fourteen days after entry of the mandate by the Court of Appeals on the pending appeal. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/5/2018. (alm, )
|
|
Filing
357
ORDERED that, on or before April 8, 2016, Defendants shall state, in writing, whether they dispute Plaintiff's assertion that he is currently homeless. Further, if Defendants contend that Plaintiff is not currently homeless, they shall submit an affidavit or other evidentiary material to support that contention. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/4/2016. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
350
ORDERED that the 285 motion for attorney's fees is DENIED without prejudice and with leave to re-file no later than fourteen days after entry of the mandate by the Court of Appeals on the pending appeal. Further, 346 the motion to strike is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/27/2015. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
283
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED and DECLARED that ASORCNA is unconstitutional under the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution to the extent that it requires (1) in-town homeless registrants to register (or check-in) on a weekly basis with two separate law-enforcement jurisdictions as provided by § 15-20A-12(b) in conjunction with § 15-20A-4(13) and (2) all in-town registrants to complete travel permit applications with two separate law-enforcement jurisdict ions as provided by § 15-20A-15 in conjunction with § 15-20A-4(13). It is further ORDERED that the Attorney Generals oral Motion to Strike and Defendants oral Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/5/2015. (kh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
