McGuire v. City of Montgomery, et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 4, 2016
ORDERED that, on or before April 8, 2016, Defendants shall state, in writing, whether they dispute Plaintiff's assertion that he is currently homeless. Further, if Defendants contend that Plaintiff is not currently homeless, they shall submit an affidavit or other evidentiary material to support that contention. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/4/2016. (kh, )
|August 27, 2015
ORDERED that the 285 motion for attorney's fees is DENIED without prejudice and with leave to re-file no later than fourteen days after entry of the mandate by the Court of Appeals on the pending appeal. Further, 346 the motion to strike is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/27/2015. (kh, )
|February 5, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED and DECLARED that ASORCNA is unconstitutional under the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution to the extent that it requires (1) in-town homeless registrants to register (or check-in) on a weekly basis with two separate law-enforcement jurisdictions as provided by § 15-20A-12(b) in conjunction with § 15-20A-4(13) and (2) all in-town registrants to complete travel permit applications with two separate law-enforcement jurisdict ions as provided by § 15-20A-15 in conjunction with § 15-20A-4(13). It is further ORDERED that the Attorney Generals oral Motion to Strike and Defendants oral Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/5/2015. (kh, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?