Mitchell v. Rouse, et al (INMATE 1)
| Jermaine Mitchell |
| Scott Rouse, Anne A. Hill, Bart Harmon, Katherine S. Jessip, Kim T. Thomas and Al Butler |
| 2:2011cv01101 |
| December 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER AND OPINION: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 39 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/2/2015. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's 22 order and the plaintiff's 23 objection, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's order is neither clearly erroneous, nor contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's objection is OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate action. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 4/30/12. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
