LaFogg v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
| Christopher Michael LaFogg |
| Dennis Meeks and Preston Hughes |
| 2:2011cv01103 |
| December 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 28 is DENIED; that Defendants file a response to the allegations of the motion 28 on or before June 25, 2013, and that the motion is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings she deems appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/14/2013. (jg, ) Modified on 6/14/2013 to clarify docket text (jg, ).
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER AND OPINION that the 7 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. Plaintiff's claims against the Covington County Jail are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I); 2. The Covington County Jail is DISMISSED as a party to this complaint; and 3. This case with respect to the remaining defendants is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 2/1/2012. (jg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
