Kenner v. Forniss, et al (INMATE 1)
| Preston Kenner |
| Leon Forniss and Kim Tobias Thomas |
| 2:2012cv00237 |
| March 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Elmore |
| Charles S. Coody |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
OPINION and ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 19 be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and4. Costs of this proceeding be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff forwhich execution may issue. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/1/2013. (jg, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER that the 5 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections and Luther Strange are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to th e directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). 2. The Alabama Department of Corrections and Luther Strange are DISMISSED as Defendants in this case. 3. This case, with respect to the allegations set forth against Defendants Leon Forniss and Kim Thomas, are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/10/2012. (jg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
