Land Ventures for 2, LLC v. Fritz et al
| Land Ventures for 2, LLC |
| Michael A. Fritz, Sr. and Fritz, Hughes & Hill, LLC |
| 2:2012cv00240 |
| March 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Fritz's Motion to Strike (MP Doc. # 44) is GRANTED as to paragraphs 5 & 6 of Scott's Declaration (MP Doc. # 40-2, Ex. B); (2) Land Ventures' Objection (MP Doc. # 50) is OVERRU LED; (3) The Recommendation on the issue of causation (Doc. # 34) is ADOPTED; (4) Fritz's Motion for Summary Judgment (MP Doc. # 33) is GRANTED; and (5) Land Ventures' Motion for Summary Judgment (MP Doc. # 31) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/29/2015. (furn: Bankruptcy Clerk) (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 USC § 636(c)(4) and General Order No. 3156, the erroneous primary assignment of this matter to the magistrate judge is VACATED; further ORDERED that the orders previously entered by the magistrate judge are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED; DIRECTING the Clerk to annotate the docket to reflect the primary assignment of this case to the undersigned district judge. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/9/2015. (wcl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
