Poma-Pratt v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 9, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER regarding Defendants' 141 Objections to Specific Exhibits Designated by Plaintiff. It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants Objections to Exhibits 3, 4, 5, and 6 are SUSTAINED to the extent that if the Plaintiff co ntends that the Defendants have opened the door to the use of this evidence, the Plaintiff must first take it up admission of the evidence outside of the presence of the jury, and the court will take up any objection to the evidence at that time. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/9/2015. (dmn, )
|November 5, 2015
ORDER: This cause is before the court on the Plaintiffs' 145 Objections to Specific Exhibits Designated by Defendant. The Plaintiffs object to exhibits listed by the Defendants as Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 16. The court will rule on the Plaintiff's objection to the photographs at trial, after a proper foundation is laid for their admissibility. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/5/2015. (dmn, )
|April 3, 2012
ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTION directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $9.83 be paid on or before 4/23/2012; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Kilby Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 4/3/2012. (dmn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?