Loucks, et al. v. Shorest, LLC, et al.
| Valerie Malissia Veazey Loucks and Amanda Victoria Woodham |
| Shorest, LLC and RHI, Inc. |
| 2:2012cv00304 |
| April 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Chilton |
| Charles S. Coody |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) The Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment (Doc. # 101 ) is DENIED as to the default judgment entered on liability; (2) This case will be set for trial by jury for the purpose of determining the amount of damages by separate Order at a later date. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/19/14. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER that the Plfs are given until noon on 5/7/2013 to supplement their response, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/6/2013. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 59 Motion to Exclude Witnesses Under "the Rule." Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/1/2013. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
67
ORDERED as follows: 1) The 53 Motion in Limine is GRANTED as to the Plfs' offering testimony of a legal conclusion as to "constructive discharge," and is DENIED as to the Plfs' testimony about emotional pain, embarrassment, and humiliation they suffered, linked to treatment experienced in their employment. The motion is held in abeyance in all other respects; 2) The Plfs are given until 5/3/2013 to specifically identify evidence of personal knowledge of affairs of Dr. Smith and other cases or claims they seek to admit at trial, together with the identify of any witnesses through whom such evidence would be elicited and briefing the basis for admission. The Dfts have until 5/8/2013 to respond in support of their motion in light of that identification of evidence. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/30/2013. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER directing as follows: (1) the 60 Motion in Limine is GRANTED, as further set out in order; (2) because the remaining categories of evidence identified in the plaintiff's motion in limine are unclear and do not identify particular eviden ce, the Motion in Limine is DENIED as to evidence not known to the decision maker at the time of the decision and evidence of affirmative defenses not pled, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/26/13. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying as moot 33 Motion for Writ of Attachment; denying as moot 34 Motion for Leave to Supplement the Motion for Writ Attachment. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/8/2013. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 12 MOTION to Strike Dfts' Answer and Affirmative Defenses, or in the Alternative, Plfs' Motion for a More Definite Statement. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/13/2012. (wcl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
