Iberia Bank v. Polk, et al
| Iberia Bank |
| Polk Family Properties, LLC and William R. Polk |
| 2:2012cv00639 |
| July 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER: 1. The pretrial conference and trial setting in this case are CONTINUEDGENERALLY; 2. The deadlines set forth in Sections 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 9 of the Amended Scheduling Order 50 , and the deadlines set forth in the Court's July 2, 2013 Or der 62 are CONTINUED GENERALLY; 3. The parties shall pursue discovery in this case expeditiously; 4. This case is REFERRED to the assigned magistrate judge for a discovery conference as further set out; 5. The Motion for Extension of Deadline as to Expert Witnesses 73 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/2/2013. (jg, ) TERMINATED: Final Pretrial Conference 02/06/2014; Non-Jury Trial 03/10/2014
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER: re 73 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Deadlines: that this matter is set for a telephonic status conference on July 31, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Polk's counsel is further instructed to initiate the telephone call. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 7/26/2013. (jg, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER directing that, upon consideration of Defendant William R. Polk's 40 Motion to Continue, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED for good cause shown. Trial in this case is CONTINUED until March 10, 2014, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/3/13. (Furnished to Calendar/WR)(Term'd: Non Jury Trial 11/04/2013)(scn, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER directing that, upon consideration of the parties' arguments, it is hereby ORDERED that Polk file a supplement to his previously-filed 40 Motion to Continue on or before May 21, 2013, which specifically addresses any deadlines in the 25 Uniform Scheduling Order and the 33 Amended Scheduling Order that Polk seeks to extend (or reopen) and provides new deadlines for the Court's consideration, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/14/13. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER directing as follows: (1) The parties' deadline for completing discovery, currently set to expire on May 15, 2013, pursuant to the 33 Amended Scheduling Order, is CONTINUED through and including July 15, 2013; (2) The parties' deadline for filing dispositive motions, currently set to expire on May 13, 2013 (Order, Doc. # 31 ), is CONTINUED through and including July 5, 2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 4/29/13. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER directing that the 26 Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED; further ORDERED that Mr. Polk, with the assistance of counsel for Defendant Polk Family Properties, LLC, file a status report on or before March 29, 2013, as further set out; further ORDER ED that the 27 motion is due to be GRANTED PART and DENIED IN PART to give Mr. Polk the time necessary to obtain new counsel, as further set out; further ORDERED that: (1) The parties' deadline for filing dispositive motions, currently set to expire on March 13, 2013, pursuant to the 25 Scheduling Order in this case, is CONTINUED through and including May 13, 2013; and (2) The parties' deadline for completing discovery, currently set to expire on May 15, 2013, is CONTINUED through and including July 15, 2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/1/13. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
