Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Saibaba, L.L.C. et al
Plaintiff: Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant: Dahya R. Patel, Sheela D. Patel and Saibaba, L.L.C.
Case Number: 2:2012cv00688
Filed: August 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDERED as follows: (1) The Receiver's 40 Request for a Hearing and Motion to Approve the Sale of Real and Personal Property is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART with leave to refile. It is granted to the extent that it requests a hearing to confirm the proposed sale. A hearing is set for 7/30/2013, at 9:00 A.M. in Courtroom 2A, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. The 40 motion is DENIED to the extent it requests the Court approve the private sale at this time, prior to holding th e requisite hearing on the matter; (2) The Receiver is DIRECTED to provide written notice of the sale confirmation hearing to the proposed buyer and any other interested parties at least 5 business days in advance of the hearing; (3) The Receiver is DIRECTED to publish the terms of the sale (Doc. # 40 -1) in the Montgomery Advertiser in substantially the same form as presented in the exhibit entitled Notice to Parties in Interest (Doc. # 40 -2) at least ten days before confirmation of the privat e sale of the Days Inn Hotel; (4) The Receiver's 45 Motion to Approve Appointment of Appraisers of Real and Personal Property is GRANTED; (5) The Receiver's 46 Motion for Order Setting Expedited Hearing on Receiver's Motion to Approve Appointment of Appraisers of Real and Personal Property is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/27/2013. (furn: Calendar, wr) (wcl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Saibaba, L.L.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dahya R. Patel
Represented By: Michael Aaron Fritz, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheela D. Patel
Represented By: Michael Aaron Fritz, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saibaba, L.L.C.
Represented By: Michael Aaron Fritz, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Branch Banking and Trust Company
Represented By: Donald M. Warren
Represented By: Clifton Charles Mosteller
Represented By: Joe Alan Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?