Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, et al v. The State of Alabama, et al (PANEL)(LEAD)
Plaintiff: Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, Bobby Singleton, Alabama Association of Black County Officials, Fred Armstead, George Bowman, Rhondel Rhone, Albert F. Turner, Jr. and Jiles Williams, Jr.
Defendant: The State of Alabama and Beth Chapman
Case Number: 2:2012cv00691
Filed: August 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Hale
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Referring Judge: William H Pryor
2 Judge: Myron H. Thompson
3 Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Voting
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1973 Voting Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 374 JUDGMENT: In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: (1) As to 2012 Alabama Laws 603, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants with respec t to Senate District 20, Senate District 26, and Senate District 28; (2) As to 2012 Alabama Laws 602, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants with respect to House District 32, House District 53, House District 54, House Dis trict 70, House District 71, House District 77, House District 82, House District 85, and House District 99; (3) As 2012 Alabama Laws 603 and 2012 Alabama Laws 602, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs with respect to the other 24 challenged districts; and (4) John H. Merrill, as Secretary of the State of Alabama, and his successors in office, are ENJOINED from conducting any election under 2012 Alabama Laws 603, for a senator of the Alabama Senate from Senate Distri ct 20, Senate District 26, and Senate District 28, and from conducting any election under 2012 Alabama Laws 602 for a representative to the Alabama House of Representatives from House District 32, House District 53, House District 54, House District 70, House District 71, House District 77, House District 82, House District 85, and House District 99. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/23/2017. (kh, )
January 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 317 THOMPSON, District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: re 316 Memorandum Opinion and Order; respectfully dissenting from the majority's conclusion that an additional 12 districts (Senate Districts 23 and 24 and House Districts 52, 55, 56, 57, 60, 67, 68, 69, 83, and 97) are constitutional, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/20/17. (djy, )
May 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 243 STATEMENT OF JUDGE THOMPSON: I agree to the adoption of the 53 Order of 12/26/2012. Also, since the majority readopts its opinion and order of 8/2/2013 (doc. no. 174 ), I readopt my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (doc. no. 175 ). As to the majority's readoption of parts of its order and final judgment of 12/20/2013 (doc. nos. 203 and 205 ), I did not join in their conclusions that the plaintiffs failed to prove either their claim of vote dilution under § 2 or their claim of intentional discrimination in violation of § 2, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Fifteenth Amendment, and I do not join in those conclusions today. I also do not join in the majority's readoption of part of their findings of fact, for I did not join in them at the time they were entered. Finally, I do not readopt my dissent (including the factual findings set forth) (doc. no. 204 ), for I am obligated to reconsider fully the racial gerrymandering claim in light of the legal principles articulated by the Supreme Court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/29/2015. (dmn, )
December 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 204 THOMPSON, District Judge, dissenting re 203 Memorandum Opinion and Order. By Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson entered on 12/20/2013. (dmn, )
August 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 175 THOMPSON, District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part with 174 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/2/2013. (dmn, )
April 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 102 THOMPSON, District Judge, concurring with 101 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/5/2013. (dmn, )
December 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the 7 motion by the Black Caucus for partial summary judgment and for preliminary and permanent injunction as to count one of its complaint is DENIED; the 29 motion by the State defendants for judgment on the pleadings as to count one of the complaint filed by the Black Caucus is GRANTED; the 29 motion by the State defendants for judgment on the pleadings as to count two of that complaint is DENIED; count three of that complaint is DISMISSED WITH OUT PREJUDICE; We GRANT the Black Caucus leave to amend its complaint within 21 days from the date of this order; the 29 motion by the State defendants for judgment on the pleadings as to count three of that complaint is DENIED AS MOOT; as further set out. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins, United States Circuit Judge William H. Pryor, Jr., and United States District Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/26/12. (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, et al v. The State of Alabama, et al (PANEL)(LEAD)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alabama Legislative Black Caucus
Represented By: James Uriah Blacksher
Represented By: U. W. Clemon
Represented By: Wilson Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bobby Singleton
Represented By: James Uriah Blacksher
Represented By: U. W. Clemon
Represented By: Wilson Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alabama Association of Black County Officials
Represented By: James Uriah Blacksher
Represented By: U. W. Clemon
Represented By: Wilson Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fred Armstead
Represented By: James Uriah Blacksher
Represented By: U. W. Clemon
Represented By: Wilson Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Bowman
Represented By: James Uriah Blacksher
Represented By: U. W. Clemon
Represented By: Wilson Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rhondel Rhone
Represented By: James Uriah Blacksher
Represented By: U. W. Clemon
Represented By: Wilson Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert F. Turner, Jr.
Represented By: James Uriah Blacksher
Represented By: U. W. Clemon
Represented By: Wilson Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jiles Williams, Jr.
Represented By: James Uriah Blacksher
Represented By: U. W. Clemon
Represented By: Wilson Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The State of Alabama
Represented By: James William Davis
Represented By: Misty Shawn Fairbanks Messick
Represented By: John Joseph Park, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beth Chapman
Represented By: James William Davis
Represented By: Misty Shawn Fairbanks Messick
Represented By: John Joseph Park, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?