Howard v. McWhorter et al(INMATE 1)
||Daron Durane Howard
||Southern Health Partners, Inc., Millard H. McWhorter, Covington County Jail, Dennis Meeks and County Commissioner
||August 10, 2012
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Truman M. Hobbs
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 3, 2014
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the plf's 34 objections are overruled; (2) the 33 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) defendants' 28 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, as further set out in order; (4) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 USC 1997(e), as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/3/14. (djy, )
|September 18, 2012
ORDER that: 1. The 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff's claims against the Covington County Jail are dismissed withprejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. The plai ntiffs claims against the unidentified county commissioner are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 4. The Covington County Jail and county commissioner are dismissed as defendants in this cause of action; and 5. The plaintiffs claims against the remaining defendants are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/18/2012. (dmn, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?