Culpepper v. Stryker Corporation et al
| Elizabeth Culpepper |
| Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation, Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Brennan Blackmon |
| 2:2012cv00767 |
| September 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Bullock |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 15 Motion to Remand is DENIED, and Defendant Blackmon is DISMISSED from this action WITH PREJUDICE; (2) Defendant Blackmon's 5 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as MOOT; (3) T he parties' 19 and 20 Motions to Strike are DENIED; (4) The Corporate Defendants' 4 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED with LEAVE TO REFILE; and (5) The stay of this case, as ordered by this Court's 14 Order is LIFTED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/12/13. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Stay 7 is GRANTED and that this cause of action is STAYED pending resolution of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, which Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file on or before October 7, 2012; that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension 12 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/25/2012. (jg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
