Horton v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
Steven Horton |
Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Rebecca Bonner, Mitchell Patton, Leonardo Johnson and Alabama Department of Corrections |
2:2013cv00152 |
March 12, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Bullock |
Truman M. Hobbs |
Wallace Capel |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDERED that the 27 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; further ORDERED that the 13 motion for summary judgment filed by Dfts Thomas and Jones is GRANTED, and that this case against Dfts Patton and Bonner is DISMISSED without prejudice under Rule 4(m) FRCP for failure to effect service. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/11/2016. (wcl, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER that: 1. The RECOMMENDATIONS (Docs. 5 & 6 ) of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED; 3. Plaintiffs claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections and inmateJohnson are D ISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 4. The Alabama Department of Corrections and inmate Johnson are DISMISSED as parties to this cause of action; and 5. This case, with respect to Plaintiffs claims against the remaining defendants, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 5/13/2013. (dmn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.