Brown v. Progress Rail Services Corp.
| Kelsie Brown |
| Progress Rail Services Corp. |
| 2:2013cv00334 |
| May 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Charles S Coody |
| Mark E Fuller |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. #18 ) filed by the parties on November 11, 2013, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and expenses; the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on this 14th day of November, 2013. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Progress Rail Services Corp.. (Bostick, Brian) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER directing that the parties file a joint stipulation of dismissal on or before November 12, 2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/29/13. (scn, )
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER directing that the order setting a status and scheduling conference on October 10, 2013 (doc. #10 ) be and is hereby VACATED and the status and scheduling conference set for October 10, 2013 be and is hereby CANCELED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/02/13. (Furnished to Calendar/WS)(scn, )
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER directing that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than October 30, 2013, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/01/13. (scn, )
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER directing that the Court's #3 Order referring this case to the Magistrate Judge is VACATED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/01/13. (scn, )
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher W Worshek on behalf of Kelsie Brown (Worshek, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 Return Receipt Card indicating service of #10 Order; signed by (ILLEGIBLE) for Kelsie Brown on 09/28/2013. (scn, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Tae Phillips on behalf of Progress Rail Services Corp. (Phillips, Matthew) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER directing that this matter be and is hereby set for a status and scheduling conference on October 10, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4B, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse Complex, 1 Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/27/13. (Furnished to Calendar/WS)(scn, )
|
| Filing 9 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Progress Rail Services Corp.. (Bostick, Brian) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Progress Rail Services Corp..(Bostick, Brian) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kelsie Brown. Progress Rail Services Corp. served on 9/5/2013, answer due 9/26/2013. (jg, ) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Progress Rail Services Corp. and returned to Janice O'Neal for personal service by process server. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 5 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Kelsie Brown re #4 SECOND Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Durable Power of Attorney) (wcl, ) |
| Filing 4 SECOND Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Kelsie Brown; Corporate Disclosures due by 7/22/2013; Copy mailed to plf with conflict form. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(wcl, ) |
|
Filing 3
(VACATED PURSUANT TO #3 ORDER DATED 10/01/2013) ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody for for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any orders or recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/25/2013. (dmn, ) Modified on 10/1/2013 (scn, ).
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Kelsie Brown; Corporate Disclosures due by 5/31/2013. Copy mailed to plf with conflict form. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(wcl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Progress Rail Services Corp. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602027194.), filed by Kelsie Brown. (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(wcl, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Kelsie Brown. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #1 for pdf) (wcl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Progress Rail Services Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelsie Brown | |
| Represented By: | Christopher W Worshek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Progress Rail Services Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Tae Phillips |
| Represented By: | Brian Roberts Bostick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
