Wells v. Gourmet Services Inc. et al (MAG+)
| Lawrence Wells |
| Gourmet Services Inc., Al Baker, Gil Jones, Tia Benton, Charles Jones and Jasper Manuel |
| 2:2013cv00516 |
| July 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
204
ORDERED that the motion (Doc. # 202 ) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/23/2018. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
196
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Defendant' motion for sanctions (Doc. # 188 ) is GRANTED and that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Further, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Doc. # 186 ) is DENIED as moot. Final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/5/2018. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
179
ORDERED that the petition for attorney's fees (Doc. # 170 ) is GRANTED and that Defendants are liable to Plaintiff for an attorney's fee in the amount of $5,400.00, payable on or before January 31, 2017. Failure to timely pay the atto rney's fee may result in the striking of all affirmative defenses (see Doc. # 163 at 4 2) or other appropriate sanctions. Further, upon consideration of Plaintiff's status report (Doc. # 173 ), it is ORDERED that, on or before December 22, 2016, the parties shall file a joint status report, as further set out. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/14/2016. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER that the 169 Motion to Reconsider is DENIED as further set out in the order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/17/2016. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
162
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants' 140 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/23/2016. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER that Defendants' 96 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED as further set out in the order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/15/2015. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Mr. Wells's 74 Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Discovery and File Dispositive Motion is DENIED as further set out in the opinion and order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/27/2015. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: 1. The 64 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. That, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Wells's Title VII claim that he was subjected to a hostile work environment, wrongful discharge, anddeprivation of pay on the basis of national origin is dismissed with prejudice;3. That, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Wells's claim that he was subjected to a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII on the basis of his race is dismissed with prejudice; 4. That, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Wells'sclaim that he was deprived of pay in violation of Title VII on the basis of his race is dismissed with prejudice; 5. That, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Wells's claim subjected to unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII i s dismissed with prejudice; 6. That Wells's state law claims is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; 7. That, in all other respects, the motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 37 ) is denied; and 8. That this case proceed solely on Wells's FLSA claim. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/9/2014. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER that Wells's 4/30/2014 ORAL Motion to Amend his 47 Amended Complaint to include a claim that he was subjected to a hostile work environment, wrongful discharge, and deprivation of pay in violation of Title VII on the basis of national o rigin be and is hereby GRANTED. Further, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that the motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 37 ) be granted to the following extent: 1. that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 19 15(e)(2)(B)(ii), Wells's Title VII claim that he was subjected to a hostile work environment, wrongful discharge, and deprivation of pay on the basis of national origin be dismissed with prejudice; 2. that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Wells's claim that he was subjected to a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII on the basis of his race be dismissed with prejudice;3. that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Wells's claim that he was deprived of pay in violation of Title VII on the basis of his race be dismissed with prejudice; 4. that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Wells's claim su bjected to unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII be dismissed with prejudice; 5. that Wells's state law claims be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; 6. that, in all other respects, the motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 37 ) be denied; and 7. that this case proceed solely on Wells's FLSA claim. Objections to R&R due by 8/4/2014. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 7/21/2014. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
