McCoy v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
Warren McCoy |
Officer Delgardo, Officer McCurdy, Curtis Forbus, Kurt McCune, Keith Armagost, Board of Pardons and Paroles and Cynthia Dillard |
2:2013cv00627 |
August 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Elmore |
Susan Russ Walker |
W. Harold Albritton |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 27 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/21/2014. (wcl, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER AND OPINION that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 8 be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The claims against the Board of Pardons and Paroles is DISMISSED with prejudice as further set out; 2. To the extent the plaintiff presents cl aims which challenge the constitutionality of the revocation of his parole by the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, these claims are DISMISSED as further set out; 3. As the plaintiff's claims against Cynthia Dillard relate to the parole board's decision to revoke parole, Dillard is DISMISSED as a defendant; 4. The plaintiff's claim of excessive force lodged against defendants Armagost, McCune, Forbus, McCurdy and Delgardo are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/28/2013. (jg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.