Turner v. Allstate Insurance Company
| Garnet Turner |
| Allstate Insurance Company |
| 2:2013cv00685 |
| September 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
519
ORDER: On 12/13/2022, this court entered an order denying Plaintiffs' motions to vacate final judgment and to conduct discovery. (Doc. 517 .) On 1/12/2023, Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal. (Doc. [5 18].) Defendant Allstate Insurance Company currently has two pending motions: a Motion for Judgment on Bonds and a Motion for Taxable Costs. (Docs. 474 , 475 .) Accordingly, guided by considerations of judicial economy, it is ORDERED that the Defen dant's motions are DENIED without prejudice. The Defendant is granted leave to refile its motions pending the outcome of all appeals no later than fourteen (14) days after the final mandate from all appeals is isseu Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 1/17/2023. Furnished Appeals Clerk.(dmn, )
|
|
Filing
517
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED as follows: (1) The 465 Motion of Turner Plaintiffs Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1 For Order Vacating Final Judgment is DENIED; (2) The Klaas Plaintiffs' 467 Response to Motion of T urner Plaintiffs Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1 For Order Vacating Final Judgment, which the Court construes as a joinder in the Turner Plaintiffs' motion to vacate, is DENIED; (3) The Turner Plaintiffs' 467 Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery on the Issue of Judge Marks' Ownership of Allstate Stock is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 12/13/2022. (am, )
|
|
Filing
421
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 419 show cause order is hereby VACATED; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by the Defendant, if any there be, why the Turner Plaintiffs' and Klaas Plaintiffs' 418 & 420 motions should not be granted; Show Cause Response due by 9/2/2020; The Turner and Klaas Plaintiffs may file a reply on or before 9/9/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/19/2020. (amf, )
|
|
Filing
419
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by defendant as to why Turner plfs 418 Motion for Preliminary Injunction should not be granted; Show Cause Response due by 8/27/2020; the Turner plfs may file a reply on or before 9/3/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/13/2020. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
217
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 153 MOTION to Compel the redeposition of Jim DeVries, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/24/17. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
185
ORDER GRANTING parties' 181 Joint MOTION for Extension of Deadlines for Expert disclosures; further ORDERING that Sections 2 and 8 of the 149 uniform scheduling order, as amended 172 , are amended as follows: SECTION 2: Dispositive Mot ions. Dispositive motions, e.g., motions for summary judgment, shall be filed no later than September 20, 2017. A brief and all supporting evidence shall be filed with any such motion. In all briefs filed by any party relating to the motion, the di scussion of the evidence in the brief must be accompanied by a specific reference, by page and line, to where the evidence can be found in a supporting deposition or document. Failure to make such specific reference may result in the evidence not be ing considered by the court. Daubert motions shall be filed on or before June 19, 2017, unless the deadline is modified by the court upon motion of a party demonstrating good cause; SECTION 8: Expert Witness Disclosures. The parties shall disclose t o each other the identity of ANY person who may be used at trial to present evidence under Rules 701, 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and provide the reports of retained experts or witnesses whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involved giving expert testimony, as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as follows: from the plaintiff(s), on or before April 19, 2017, and from the defendant(s), on or before April 19, 2017 . Expert rebuttal reports within the meaning of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D), i.e., expert reports that solely contradict or rebut evidence on the same subject matter identified by an opposing partys expert disclosure under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) or (C), shall be disclosed no later than May 19, 2017. The parties shall comply fully with all requirements of Rule 26(a)(2) in regard to disclosure of expert testimony. Unless an objection is filed within 14 days after disclosure of any expert witness, the disclosure shall be deemed to be in full compliance with the Rule; All other provisions of the Uniform Scheduling Order ( 149 , as amended 172 , remain in full force and effect. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/14/17. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER GRANTING 129 MOTION to Quash as to the following information: (1) Current employees of Allstate or former Allstate employees who retired before 1990 or after 2014; (2) documents which Allstate finds constitute work product after conducti ng a privilege review as specified in this order; and (3) personally identifying information about members of the putative classes; further ORDERING that (1) on or before 1/17/17, Allstate shall conduct a further privilege review of the documents pro duced to the court in camera and a privilege review of any other documents which Minnesota Life will produce in response to the subpoena, and (2) on or before 1/23/17, Allstate shall serve on the plaintiffs a privilege log in accordance with FED. R. CIV. P. 26(b)(5)(A); further ORDERING that in all other respects the motion to quash is DENIED and that on 1/17/2017, Minnesota Life may response to the subpoena in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 12/7/16. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER directing that the Turner plfs' 105 MOTION to Clarify is DENIED as moot; this case is no longer stayed; the parties shall proceed in accordance with the 149 uniform scheduling order; directing the clerk to lift the stay on the docket sheet. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/6/16. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER denying 107 Motion for Sanctions without prejudice and with leave to refile the motion within 14 days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/2/16. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiffs are granted leave to and including 9/30/2014, to file a Second Amended Complaint to plead Count II with particularity. It is further ORDERED that Allstate's 23 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with leave to refile at the appropriate time, and Allstate's 42 Motion for Leave to File Instanter a Response to Plaintiff's Notice and Suggestion of Recently Decided Case Law is DENIED as moot as further set out in the opinion and order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/23/2014. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Turner v. Allstate Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Garnet Turner | |
| Represented By: | Taylor Christopher Bartlett |
| Represented By: | William Lewis Garrison, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Christopher Boyce Hood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Allstate Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | David James Middlebrooks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
