Bradshaw v. Eufaula Police Department, et al. (INMATE 1)
Victor Bradshaw |
Barbour County, Barbour County Sheriff's Department and Eufaula Police Department |
2:2013cv00714 |
September 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Truman M. Hobbs |
Terry F. Moorer |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be dismissed with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon initiation of this case. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/1/13. (scn, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing that the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Victor Bradshaw (Doc. No. 2 ) be and is hereby DENIED; additionally it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for th e plaintiffs failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case; further ORDERED that on or before October 22, 2013 the parties may file objections to the Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 10/7/13. (scn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.