Strong v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Debra Strong
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2013cv00751
Filed: October 15, 2013
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Coosa
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 30, 2014 15 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court has carefully and independently reviewed the record and concludes that a remand based on new evidence is not warranted and that substantial evidence supports the ALJs conclusion that plaintiff is not disabled. Thus, the court concludes that the decisionof the Commissioner is due to be affirmed. A separate order will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/30/2014. (dmn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strong v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debra Strong
Represented By: Brian Roy Carmichael
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?