Keiss v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
||Christopher M. Keiss
||Althea C. Townsend, James Carlton, Christopher Gordy, Alabama Department of Corrections, Alex Moses, Joseph Wright and Clarence J. Hicks
||December 30, 2013
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Terry F. Moorer
||W. Harold Albritton
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 18, 2014
ORDER: No objection having been filed to the 41 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, entered on 5/23/2014, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/18/2014. (dmn, )
|February 26, 2014
ORDER as follows: 1. Plaintiff's due process challenge to the 11/3/2013 disciplinary proceedings is DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 2. Plaintiff's Complaint against Alabam a Department of Corrections is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 3. The Alabama Department of Corrections is DISMISSED as a party to this action. 4. Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. 5. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings as to all other claims. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/26/2014. (dmn, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?