Griffin v. Neptune Technology Group

Griffin v. Neptune Technology Group

Plaintiff:	Joshua Griffin
Defendant:	Neptune Technology Group
Case Number:	2:2014cv00016
Filed:	January 6, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	Elmore
Presiding Judge:	Myron H. Thompson
Presiding Judge:	Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 27, 2015	Filing 128 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 127 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this cause is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice and with the parties to bear their own costs an fees. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case remains closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/27/2015. (dmn, )
April 13, 2015	Filing 106 JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Neptune Technology Group's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 37 ) is granted as to plaintiff Joshua Griffin's Title VII retaliation claimbased on &# 039;internal complaints.' (2) Said motion is denied as to plaintiff Griffin's COBRA claim. This claim shall go to trial. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/13/2015. (dmn, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 27, 2015

Filing 128 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 127 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this cause is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice and with the parties to bear their own costs an fees. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case remains closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/27/2015. (dmn, )

April 13, 2015

Filing 106 JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Neptune Technology Group's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 37 ) is granted as to plaintiff Joshua Griffin's Title VII retaliation claimbased on &# 039;internal complaints.' (2) Said motion is denied as to plaintiff Griffin's COBRA claim. This claim shall go to trial. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/13/2015. (dmn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffin v. Neptune Technology Group
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Griffin
Represented By:	John Michael Segrest
Represented By:	Philip Dale Segrest, Sr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Neptune Technology Group
Represented By:	Katherine Suttle Weinert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?