Hatcher v. Thomas (INMATE 1)

Plaintiff: Ronald Lee Hatcher
Defendant: Kim Tobias Thomas
Case Number: 2:2014cv00067
Filed: January 31, 2014
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Madison
0 Judge: W. Harold Albritton
1 Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 22, 2017 54 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the 53 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The dft's 18 , 24 , 34 , 38 , 39 & 51 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 2) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the dft; 3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/22/2017. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hatcher v. Thomas (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Lee Hatcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kim Tobias Thomas
Represented By: Bart Gregory Harmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?