Stephens v. Goggans, et al. (MAG+)
James A. Stephens, III |
Jo Lynn Burnette and Glen Goggans |
2:2014cv00569 |
June 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Elmore |
Mark E. Fuller |
Wallace Capel |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The plaintiff's objection (Doc. # 12 ) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on July 25, 2014 is overruled; (2) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 11 ) entered on July 10 2014 is adopted; (3) This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/8/14. (scn, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 4 ) is DENIED; (3) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 7/9/14. (scn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.