Campbell v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
Hiram Allen Campbell |
Batina Carter, Kim Tobias Thomas and Robert Bentley |
2:2014cv00661 |
July 8, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Morgan |
Terry F. Moorer |
William Keith Watkins |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to file the requisite fees or provide the court with financial information in compliance with court orders. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/16/14. (scn, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER: On 7/11/2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a 3 Recommendation in this case. Sanford Leonard Ryles, one of the persons who joined in signing the named Plaintiff's complaint in this cause, filed a timely 4 Objection received on 7/30/2014. Based upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Certify this Case as a Class Action is DENIED, and this case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/31/2014. (dmn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.