Ball v. United States of America (MAG+)(LEAD)

Plaintiff: Vanessa R. Ball
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2014cv00938
Filed: September 9, 2014
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:2679
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 7, 2015 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED as follows: 1) Vanessa R. Ball's 18 Objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 15 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) The United States's 2 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 4) Vanessa R. Ball's complaints against the US are DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/7/2015. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ball v. United States of America (MAG+)(LEAD)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vanessa R. Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Stephen Michael Doyle
Represented By: Robert Randolph Neeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?