C.D. v. Alabama CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. et al
C.D. |
Alabama CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. and Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, INC. |
2:2014cv00952 |
September 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Montgomery |
Myron H. Thompson |
Wallace Capel |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER: It is ORDERED as follows: (1) At the June 10 fairness hearing, the parties are to present evidence that satisfies the question "What testimony and evidence should be produced at the hearing?" contained in the article Wil liam E. Shreve, Jr., Settling the Claims of a Minor, 72 Ala. Law. 308, 309 (2011). (2) Two business days prior to the hearing, the parties should submit to the court a proposed opinion and order that satisfy the question "What should be included in the order approving the settlement?" contained in said article. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/26/2015. (kh, ) |
Filing 40 ORDER: The court having been informed that this case is settled, it is further ORDERED that all unresolved motions are denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/22/2015. (kh, ) |
Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER directing that the removing defendant has until 11/7/2014 to amend the notice of removal to allege jurisdiction sufficiently, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/27/14. (djy, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.