Whitney Bank v. Payne Lee & Associates Architects, LLC, et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)
| Whitney Bank |
| Payne Lee & Associates Architects, LLC, David H. Payne and Mark E. Lee |
| 2:2014cv00969 |
| September 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles S. Coody |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER directing as follows: (1) Plaintiff Whitney Bank's Motion for Adjudication on Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as to Non-Bankrupt Defendant and Counterclaim (Doc. # 42 ) is GRANTED; (2) Defendant Payne Lee & Associates Ar chitect LLC's Objection (Doc. # 38 ) is OVERRULED; (3) The Recommendation (Doc. # 37 ) is partially ADOPTED; (4) Defendant David H. Payne's Counterclaim is DISMISSED with prejudice; (5) Plaintiff Whitney Bank's Motion for Summary Jud gment is GRANTED as to Defendant Payne Lee & Associates; (6) The stay remains in full force and effect as to Plaintiff's claims against debtor-Defendants Mark E. Lee and David H. Payne; and (7) The Recommendation (Doc. # 37 ) and Objection (Doc. # 38 ) remain pending as to debtor-Defendants Mark E. Lee and David H. Payne. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on June 4, 2015. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
