Davis v. City of Clanton Police Department et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 9, 2015
ORDER: Before the court is Plaintiff Sadaka Davis's 71 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. The motion is due to be denied. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 66 ) and in the 10/28/2015 Order adopting the Recommendation in part (Doc. 68 ), Petitioners appeal is without a legal or factual basis, has no substantive merit, and is frivolous for purposes of the IFP motion. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Petitioners motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 71 ) is DENIED as further set out in the order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/9/2015. (dmn, )
|October 28, 2015
ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objection (Doc. # 67 ) is OVERRULED; (2) The Recommendation (Doc. # 66 ) is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part; (3) Defendant's motion for sanctions (Doc. # 58 ), which includes requests for dismissa l of this action in its entirety and for an award of monetary sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, is GRANTED; (4) Plaintiff shall reimburse Defendant $788.01, which includes reasonable attorney's fees and costs associated wi th Plaintiff's failure to attend the properly noticed deposition; and (5) Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. # 61 ) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) is DENIED. A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/28/2015. (kh, )
|March 26, 2015
ORDER as follows: 1. Officer Smitherman's 35 Objection is OVERRULED. 2. The 33 Recommendation is ADOPTED. 3. Officer Smitherman's 12 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. 4. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on Mr. Davis's claim. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/26/2015. (dmn, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?