The Mill Steel Company et al v. Southeastern Stud & Component, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 19, 2015
ORDER granting 54 Motion to Lift Stay; ORDERED that the stay imposed by Order dated November, 26, 2014, is LIFTED as to all parties, with the exception of Southeastern Stud & Components, Inc. It is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs file a Third Amen ded Complaint on or before February 25, 2015, to reflect the current status of the litigation. Defendants are DIRECTED to answer, counterclaim, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint on or before March 9, 2015. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/19/2015. (kh, )
|November 26, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that Plfs' 27 Motion to Stay Litigation in Light of Bankruptcy is GRANTED and all other pending motions are DENIED as moot; further ORDERED that, on the first day of each second month, beginning 2/1/2015, the parties are DIRECTED to file a joint report as to the status of the bankruptcy proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/26/2014. (wcl, )
|October 22, 2014
ORDER denying 18 Motion to Continue Hearing; The hearing scheduled for 10/23/2014, at 3:00 p.m. in courtroom 2B of the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse will take place as scheduled, but as a status and planning conference, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/22/2014. (wcl, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?