Johnson v. Chilton County 9-1-1 District

Plaintiff: Mildred E. Johnson
Defendant: Chilton County 9-1-1 District
Case Number: 2:2014cv01138
Filed: November 6, 2014
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Chilton
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 9, 2015 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED that the 17 motion is denied to the extent that it asks to continue the pretrial and trial dates, but is granted to the extent that the deadline for dispositive motions is reset from September 10, 2015, to October 12, 2015. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/9/2015. (kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Chilton County 9-1-1 District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mildred E. Johnson
Represented By: John David Saxon(Designation Retained)
Represented By: John David Saxon, Jr.(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chilton County 9-1-1 District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?