Beckwith v. Kimble (INMATE 1)

Plaintiff: Keith Lamar Beckwith
Defendant: Starsha Kimble
Case Number: 2:2014cv01154
Filed: November 13, 2014
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Barbour
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 27, 2015 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED and that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of Plaintiff to pay the initial partial filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by the court. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on February 27, 2015. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beckwith v. Kimble (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Lamar Beckwith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starsha Kimble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?