Hammonds v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
Mikel Hammonds |
Karla Jones, Derrick Carter, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Bryant, Kim Tobias Thomas, Lt. Peavy, Sgt. Jones and Sgt. Teal |
2:2015cv00006 |
January 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Barbour |
Charles S. Coody |
William Keith Watkins |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 35 Objection is OVERRULED; (2) The 29 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (3) Plaintiffs claims regarding placement in the restricted privileges dorm, violations of the First Amendment, denial of access to courts, an d failure to investigate complaints are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and/or (ii); (4) Plaintiffs 25 Motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED; and (5) Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim regarding conditions of confinement in the restricted privileges dorm is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/6/2015. (dmn, ) |
Filing 21 ORDER as follows: 1. Plaintiff's 16 Objection is OVERRULED. 2. The 15 Recommendation is ADOPTED. 3. The 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED as further set out in the order. 4. The case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/25/2015. (dmn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.