Wood v. State of Alabama, 187th Fighter Wing, Fire Department(JOINT ASSIGN)

Plaintiff: Michael Cody Wood
Defendant: State of Alabama, 187th Fighter Wing, Fire Department
Case Number: 2:2015cv00273
Filed: April 24, 2015
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Autauga
0 Judge: W. Harold Albritton
1 Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 29, 2015 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss and that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/29/2015. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood v. State of Alabama, 187th Fighter Wing, Fire Department(JOINT ASSIGN)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Cody Wood
Represented By: Jackson Brett Harrison(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Alabama, 187th Fighter Wing, Fire Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?