Traywick v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
| Kenneth Shaun Traywick |
| Kim Tobias Thomas, Woodrow A. Myers, Jr., Dr. Crocker, Louis Boyd, Jackie Pettway, Jefferson S. Dunn, Corizon Medical Services, LLC, Nancy Barnette and Willy Jackson |
| 2:2015cv00372 |
| May 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Elmore |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) Plf's 87 & 90 objections are overruled; (2) The 86 recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted to the extent discussed above; (3) The 78 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/18/2016. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
73
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 66 ) is adopted. (2) The motion and amended motion for preliminary injunction (doc. nos. 33 & 55 ) are denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/16/2015. (kh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
