Hayden v. Vance, et al. (MAG+)
| Steven Mark Hayden |
| Robert S. Vance, Jr., Anne-Marie Adams, J. Scott Vowell, Houston Brown, Roy Moore, James Allen Main, Alisa Kelli Wise, Gregory Shaw, Lyn Stuart, Thomas Francis Parker, William B. Cashion, Western Steel Inc., Merchants Commercial Bank, William C. Thompson, Craig Sorrell Pittman, Terri Willingham Thomas, Terry A. Moore, Scott Donaldson, U.S. Department of Justice and Joyce White Vance |
| 2:2015cv00469 |
| July 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Elmore |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER directing as follows: (1) plf's 104 Objections are OVERRULED; (2) the 103 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (3) the 77 Motion for Attorneys' fees and costs is GRANTED to the extent that defs are entitled to an award of $15,000.00 in attorneys' fees and $76.06 in costs and expenses and DENIED to the extent defs seek fees and expenses beyond these amounts; (4) the 86 MOTION for lawyer discipline and FRCP Rule 35 Exam is DENIED; (5) the 102 MOTION to Strike is DENIED; (6) the 102 MOTION to Alter Judgment is DENIED; (3) the 102 MOTION for Sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/4/16. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER denying plf's 72 Motion to reconsider or amend, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/6/16. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER it is ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Objections (Docs. # 65 , 66 , 68 ) are OVERRULED. (2) The Recommendation is ADOPTED. (3) Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Doc. # 55 ) is DENIED. (4) Defendants William B. Cashion, Western Steel Inc. , and Merchants Commercial Bank's motions to dismiss (Docs. # 25 , 42 ) are GRANTED. (5) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 24 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED as moot in part. The motion is GRANTED as to the claims against Defendants Anne-Marie Adams, Houston Brown, Scott Donaldson, James Allen Main, Terry A. Moore, Thomas Francis Parker, Craig Sorrell Pittman, Gregory Shaw, Lyn Stuart, Terri Willingham Thomas, William C. Thompson, Robert S. Vance, Jr., J. Scott Vowell, and Alisa Kelli Wise. The motion is DENIED as moot for the claims against Roy Moore in his individual capacity because Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the individual capacity claims. (6) Defendant Roy Moore's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 50 ) the claims ag ainst him in his official capacity is GRANTED. (7) Defendant Joyce Vance's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 35 ) is GRANTED and her alternative Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. (8) The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 37 ) filed by the United States and the U.S. Department of Justice is GRANTED. (9) The federal claims in the original and amended complaints (Docs. # 1 , 33 ) are DISMISSED with prejudice. (10) The court declines supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and the state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. (11) Plaintiff's remaining motions (Docs. # 1 , 32 , 41 , 48 , 53 ) are DENIED. (12) This matter is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for a determination regarding attorneys' fees. A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/14/2016. (kh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
