Boone v. Price et al (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Daoud Boone
Defendant: Cheryl Price and Luther Strange
Case Number: 2:2015cv00556
Filed: August 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: This case is pending before the Court on a remand from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. On 1/5/2022, the Eleventh Circuit remanded this action to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether Daoud Boone is entitled to a reopening of the time to file an appeal pursuant to FRAP 4(a)(6). The Court held an evidentiary hearing on 4/1/2022. For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that Boone is not entitled to a reopening of the time to a ppeal under FRAP 4(a)(6). Accordingly, pursuant to the directive of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals remanding this case, the Court FINDS that Boone is neither eligible for nor deserving of Rule 4(a)(6) relief. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to return this case, as supplemented, to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 4/5/2022. Furnished Appeals Clerk.(dmn, )
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER finding that Boone has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. In addition, the Court is of the opinion that Boone's appeal has no legal or factual basis and, accordingly, is frivolous and not taken in good faith; DENYING 46 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 12/9/2021. Furnished to Appeals clerk. (djy, )
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER construing the 42 pro se Notice of Appeal as containing a motion for a certificate of appealability and a motion to appeal in forma pauperis; the Court finding that Boone has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. In addition, the Court is of the opinion that Boone's appeal has no legal or factual basis and, accordingly, is frivolous and not taken in good faith, as further set out in order; denying Boone's denying 42 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis and 42 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 11/8/2021. (djy, ) Modified on 11/8/2021 to clarify text to reflect as furnished to Appeals clerk (qc/djy, ).
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows that: 1. the Petitioner's 30 objections are OVERRULED; 2. the 27 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 3. the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and 4. this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/15/2021. (bes, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boone v. Price et al (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daoud Boone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cheryl Price
Represented By: John Judson Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luther Strange
Represented By: John Judson Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?