Doe 1 et al v. Strange et al(JOINT ASSIGN)
| John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7 and John Doe 8 |
| Luther Strange, III and John Richardson |
| 2:2015cv00606 |
| August 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees and costs (Doc. # 166 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: Plaintiffs are awarded $362,200.41 as a reasonable attorney;s fee for Attorney Joseph McGuire and $6,075.98 in taxable costs. The remaining requests are denied. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/5/2019. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
164
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs' first Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. # 139 ) is GRANTED as to Counts Four and Five and DENIED as to Counts One and Three. 2. Plaintiffs' second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. # 147 ) is DENIED. 3. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 154 ) is GRANTED as to Counts One and Three and DENIED as to Counts Four an d Five. 4. The State of Alabama's branded-identification requirement, Ala. Code § 15-20A-18, is DECLARED unconstitutional as applied to Plaintiffs. 5. The State of Alabamas internet-use reporting requirements, Ala. Code -20A(a)(9), (18), 15-20A-10(e)(1), are DECLARED facially unconstitutional. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/11/2019. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to File Supplement to Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 132 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' motion to supplemen t is GRANTED only as to the proposed supplement to Count III. Accordingly, Plaintiffs may supplement their second amended complaint with paragraphs 715 and 140142 of their proposed supplemental complaint. (Doc. # 134 -1.) 2. Plaintiffs' motion to supplement is DENIED in all other respects. 3. Plaintiffs shall file a revised second amended complaint on or before [14 days]. The revised second amended complaint should show the second amended complaint as it exists now i.e., incorporating as needed Alabama Act No. 2017-414, the courts ruling on Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. # 125 ), and the court's ruling in this Order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/12/2018. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. # 87 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Count 1. 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Count 2. Count 2 is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as to Count 3. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' claim that the res idency restriction is unconstitutionally vague, Ala. Code 15-20A-11(a)(e), (g). The motion is also GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' vagueness challenge to the residency, employment, school, and internet reporting requirements, id. 15-20A-(a)(5)(9), (1 8), 15-20A-10(a)(c), (e). These portions of Count 3 are DISMISSED without prejudice. The motion is DENIED as to the claim that the employment restriction is unconstitutionally vague, id. 15-20A-13(b), (d), (f). 4. Defendants' motion to dismiss i s DENIED as to Count 4. 5. Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Count 5. 6. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Count 6. Count 6 is DISMISSED without prejudice. 7. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (Doc. # 118 ) and their Amended Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (Doc. # 119 ) are DENIED at this time without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/14/2018. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' 43 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint or for More Definite Statement or to Strike is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as further set out in the opinion and order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/18/2016. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
