Schwartz v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE 2)

Plaintiff: Melody Schwartz
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections
Case Number: 2:2015cv00615
Filed: August 24, 2015
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 17, 2016 42 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that: (1) The 41 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and (3) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice and no costs are taxed. A separate final judgment will be entered. ( Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/17/2016. (dmn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schwartz v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE 2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melody Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?