Moore v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
| Thurmon E. Moore, II |
| Corizon Medical Services, H. Hood, Doctor Stone, M. Copeland, A. Long, Nurse Lee, T. Wood, R. Mitchell, T. Tellis, L.P.N. Burns, Leon Forniss, Leeposey Daniels, Kim Tobias Thomas and Warden Crow |
| 2:2016cv00013 |
| January 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Elmore |
| Gray Borden |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER: This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on 4/25/2018 (Doc. 56 ). There being no objection to the Recommendation, and after review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDE RED as follows: 1. The defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/15/2018. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER that the 38 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and that the plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/8/2016. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
