Gray v. City of Montgomery et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 28, 2017
ORDERED that the motion (Doc. # 51 ) is GRANTED, and that all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Carmen Douglas are DISMISSED without prejudice, with each party to bear her own costs. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Carmen Douglas as a Defendant to this action. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/28/2017. (kh, )
|April 11, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The 14 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to any claims brought under Title VII, the ADEA, and the FMLA against Kimbly Harris, Tracey Stephenson, Todd Strange, Melinda Chandler, Larry F isher, and J. Christopher Murphy individually and those claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to all remaining claims and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to being repled. 3. The Plaintiff is given un til April 25, 2016 to file a new Amended Complaint which repleads the claims dismissed without prejudice, should she choose to do so. The Plaintiff should plead facts to remedy the deficiencies discussed above, if she can do so within the requirement s of Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. 4. Any Amended Complaint filed in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion and Order must be filed consistently with M.D. Ala. Local Rule 15.1 and be complete unto itself, without incorporation by referenc e to the original Complaint. Any Amended Complaint should also separately identify each alleged adverse employment action and the statutory basis upon which Gray makes a claim as to that adverse employment action. If the Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint, she should consider whether to include Carmen Douglas as a Defendant, in view of the Answer filed by that Defendant to the original Complaint. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/11/2016. (kh, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?