Rudolph et al v. The City of Montgomery et al
Plaintiff: Brazil Rudolph, Tito Williams and Evelyn Brown
Defendant: The City of Montgomery and Daryl D. Bailey
Case Number: 2:2016cv00057
Filed: January 27, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 7/7/2020. (djy, )
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 108 MEMORANDUM ORDER: the Court DENIES the remaining portion of plfs' 81 Motion to Compel Discovery, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 5/9/2020. (cnw, )
April 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 91 MEMORANDUM ORDER: For these reasons, plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (ECF No. 81 )is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, AND DEFERRED IN PART. The City has 14 days from the date of this Order to file its response. Any further reply from plaintiffs shall be due 7 days from the date of the City's response. Signed by Honorable Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 4/8/2020. (kh, )
March 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 3/10/2017. (wcl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rudolph et al v. The City of Montgomery et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brazil Rudolph
Represented By: William M Dawson, Jr.
Represented By: Joseph Mitchell McGuire
Represented By: Matthew Swerdlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tito Williams
Represented By: William M Dawson, Jr.
Represented By: Joseph Mitchell McGuire
Represented By: Matthew Swerdlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evelyn Brown
Represented By: William M Dawson, Jr.
Represented By: Joseph Mitchell McGuire
Represented By: Matthew Swerdlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Montgomery
Represented By: Michael D. Brymer
Represented By: Kimberly Owen Fehl
Represented By: Shannon Lynn Holliday
Represented By: Robert David Segall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daryl D. Bailey
Represented By: Benjamin Howard Albritton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?