Franklin et al v. Hubbard et al
| Paula Franklin and Haleigh Lowery |
| David Hubbard, John Shearon, Chilton County Board of Education and Chilton County |
| 2:2016cv00206 |
| March 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Chilton |
| Gray M. Borden |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 64 ) is GRANTED, and all claims asserted by Plaintiffs Paula Franklin and Haleigh Lowery against the Chilton County Board of Education are DISMISSED with prejudice. Judgement is ENTERED in favor of the Chilton County Board of Education on all claims asserted by Plaintiffs. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 8/29/2018. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that Defendant John Shearon's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant Chilton County's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. [ 27]) is GRANTED. The claims against Defendant Chilton County are dismissed with prejudice, and the court enters summary judgment in favor of Defendant John Shearon and against Plaintiffs on all claims stated against him. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 10/13/2016. (kh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
